Trusting financial Intermediaries

In response to a tweet of mine, Anupam Gupta (b50) tweeted this

They key question is, should we trust those who claim to work on our behalf while having a business model that goes against that very logic.

Lets start of with the much hated Stock Broker. A stock broker was one who in earlier days allowed persons to buy & sell securities for a small commission. The commissions which were huge in those days steadily has crept downwards with advent of technology and more competitors.

Its general knowledge that its very tough (will not say impossible since there will always be guys who claim to make a living out of it) to make money trading the markets, especially on the intra-day time frame. Yet, almost all big brokers send daily flush of SMS calls asking their clients  to Buy ABC, Short ZYX and so on and so forth.

How many brokers have you come across who shall say, well, the way to wealth generation is not by trading but by buying and holding shares of good companies over a long period of time (I kind of disagree with my own statement out here, but I hope you get the point). How many brokers advise you to just do a SIP on Nifty Bees since the probability is high that the returns you generate by doing that is way bigger than what you can achieve on your own.

On the other hand, I come across statements such as, Invest only that money in the markets that you can afford to lose. Its no wonder that people invest a Lakh in stocks and goes out and invests a Crore in Real Estate. Worst case, he knows that the land is his no matter what happens.

For the not so sophisticated investors, there is another way to get into markets – Mutual Funds. But just like most financial products, even this needs to be Sold. So, the mutual fund distributor also becomes a kind of Financial Advisor.

A financial advisor generally makes his money by charging a X% of fees on the total assets he manages. But since most of us would not want to pay from our pocket, the advisor instead advises on funds where he gets the biggest commission. And since tail commissions are low, lets churn the portfolio every time there is a new fund offering. After all, buying at 10 is cheaper than buying a fund with a NAV of 100, Right?

In India, Insurance is not seen as a hedge but as a way to save (Invest). Its no wonder then that most Insurance Advisors (agents really) advise one against buying Term life policies and instead go for Endowment / ULIP plans where the commission paid is much higher. Even after accounting for the risk coverage, the return is so low that is makes zero sense, but hey, I get back my money here seems to be the logic.

And finally we have the Financial Advisors who claim to help you trade / invest in markets for a small monthly / quaterly fee. What I find amazing about these guys is that all of them want you to pay up in advance regardless of the results. Not a single guy says, Here is the way I do business. I advise you on what to Buy / Sell for X months. If you feel the advise is worth it, pay me XX so that I continue for the next Y months, else, no worry.

Nope, every one of them wants you to trust them with your money while not trusting you for one second. Do you really think they work for your benefit?

And finally, Portfolio Management Schemes. I have tweeted on it quite a number of times and every time i look at those numbers, I wonder who would want to invest in a product that under performs all the time. Most PMS model is build upon generating brokerage. If, and that is a big IF, they do end up making some money, they want a cut of it as well.

Almost all models in the financial sphere is out there to get a cut of your savings. There are of course, many honorable guys out there who do business which is worth for both the client and himself. But they are so far and so tiny, that you rarely hear about them, let alone learn more about them.

As the saying goes, “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch

We spend our lives trying to save every rupee we can, but what use is it, if we allow ourselves to stumble upon when the it comes to making the money earn for us.

You may also like...

4 Responses

  1. Prashanth, conflict of interest is unavoidable in any business, regulation too can not solve the problem, the best as they have done in MFs is pave the architecture of products in such a way that misselling is curbed.

    This makes to me atleast as an MF advisor the cleanest product suite to choose from depending on the investors need. Conflicts will always be there but thing that a new set of people are emerging both from investors and advisors side who want to grow in a clean way.

    • Prashanth_admin says:

      Agree with that Shankar. More power to them.

      With advent of Direct, only those advisors who add value will survive in the long run while those just fill up application forms will fall by the way side.

      Hopefully, we shall see something similar to the discount broking model we are seeing in the stock brokerage industry. Fixed fee for X amount of Capital. I see this happening already in US, time to apply similar models out here.

  2. Nilesh KAMERKAR says:

    Financial Planners, Investment Advisers are plain glorified terms for charging higher without delivering correspondingly higher benefits / returns. For if anyone possessed such skills will they not settle for percentage of profits rather than brokerage, commission or Trail etc.

    First, the investor needs to determine if s/he needs an intermediary (not an investment Advisor or FP) for facilitating investments. If the answer is yes, then the intermediary ought to be compensated in a fair & timely manner so as to make it worthwhiile for the intermediary.

    And last but most important. Any intermediary who is found to be abusing client’s trust must be dealt with swiftly and harshly so as to create an effective deterrent for mis-selling , churning etc.

    All trail model sounds good but works like sleight of hand as bigger slices get subtracted annually from the growing nest egg without any meaningful value addition – And its surprising to see All Trail model being referred to as Best for the client

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.